Journal of Applied Probability

On the role of Föllmer-Schweizer minimal martingale measure in risk-sensitive control asset management

Amogh Deshpande

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text


Kuroda and Nagai (2002) stated that the factor process in risk-sensitive control asset management is stable under the Föllmer-Schweizer minimal martingale measure. Fleming and Sheu (2002) and, more recently, Föllmer and Schweizer (2010) observed that the role of the minimal martingale measure in this portfolio optimization is yet to be established. In this paper we aim to address this question by explicitly connecting the optimal wealth allocation to the minimal martingale measure. We achieve this by using a `trick' of observing this problem in the context of model uncertainty via a two person zero sum stochastic differential game between the investor and an antagonistic market that provides a probability measure. We obtain some startling insights. Firstly, if short selling is not permitted and the factor process evolves under the minimal martingale measure, then the investor's optimal strategy can only be to invest in the riskless asset (i.e. the no-regret strategy). Secondly, if the factor process and the stock price process have independent noise, then, even if the market allows short-selling, the optimal strategy for the investor must be the no-regret strategy while the factor process will evolve under the minimal martingale measure.

Article information

J. Appl. Probab., Volume 52, Number 3 (2015), 703-717.

First available in Project Euclid: 22 October 2015

Permanent link to this document

Digital Object Identifier

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)

Zentralblatt MATH identifier

Primary: 49L02
Secondary: 60G02

Risk-sensitive control asset management minimal martingale measure zero sum stochastic differential game stability


Deshpande, Amogh. On the role of Föllmer-Schweizer minimal martingale measure in risk-sensitive control asset management. J. Appl. Probab. 52 (2015), no. 3, 703--717. doi:10.1239/jap/1445543841.

Export citation


  • Bensoussan, A. (1992). Stochastic Control of Partially Observable Systems. Cambridge University Press.
  • Berkovitz, L. D., Shreve, S. E. and Ziemer, W. P. (1993). A tribute to Wendell H. Fleming. J. SIAM Control Optimization 31, 273–281.
  • Bielecki, T. R. and Pliska, S. R. (1999). Risk-sensitive dynamic asset management. Appl. Math. Optimization 39, 337–360.
  • Fleming, W. H. (1995). Optimal investment models and risk sensitive stochastic control. In Mathematical Finance (IMA Vol. Math. Appl. 65), Springer, New York, pp. 75–88.
  • Fleming, W. H. and Sheu, S. J. (2002). Risk-sensitive control and an optimal investment model. II. Ann. Appl. Prob. 12, 730–767.
  • Föllmer, H. and Schweizer, M. (2010). Minimal martingale measure. In Encyclopedia of Quantitative Finance, John Wiley, New York, pp. 1200–1204.
  • G\=\ihman, \vI. \=I. and Skorohod, A. V. (1972). Stochastic Differential Equations. Springer, New York.
  • Girsanov, I. V. (1960). On transforming a certain class of stochastic processes by absolutely continuous substitution of measures. Theory Prob. Appl. 5, 285–301.
  • Karatzas, I. and Shreve, S. E. (1998). Methods of Mathematical Finance. Springer, New York.
  • Kuroda, K. and Nagai, H. (2002). Risk-sensitive portfolio optimization on infinite time horizon. Stoch. Stoch. Reports 73, 309–331.
  • Lefebvre, M. and Montulet, P. (1994). Risk-sensitive optimal investment policy. Internat. J. Systems Sci. 25, 183–192.
  • Whittle, P. (1990). Risk-Sensitive Optimal Control. John Wiley, Chichester.