The Annals of Applied Statistics

The importance of distinct modeling strategies for gene and gene-specific treatment effects in hierarchical models for microarray data

Steven P. Lund and Dan Nettleton

Full-text: Open access

Abstract

When analyzing microarray data, hierarchical models are often used to share information across genes when estimating means and variances or identifying differential expression. Many methods utilize some form of the two-level hierarchical model structure suggested by Kendziorski et al. [Stat. Med. (2003) 22 3899–3914] in which the first level describes the distribution of latent mean expression levels among genes and among differentially expressed treatments within a gene. The second level describes the conditional distribution, given a latent mean, of repeated observations for a single gene and treatment. Many of these models, including those used in Kendziorski’s et al. [Stat. Med. (2003) 22 3899–3914] EBarrays package, assume that expression level changes due to treatment effects have the same distribution as expression level changes from gene to gene. We present empirical evidence that this assumption is often inadequate and propose three-level hierarchical models as extensions to the two-level log-normal based EBarrays models to address this inadequacy. We demonstrate that use of our three-level models dramatically changes analysis results for a variety of microarray data sets and verify the validity and improved performance of our suggested method in a series of simulation studies. We also illustrate the importance of accounting for the uncertainty of gene-specific error variance estimates when using hierarchical models to identify differentially expressed genes.

Article information

Source
Ann. Appl. Stat., Volume 6, Number 3 (2012), 1118-1133.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 31 August 2012

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoas/1346418576

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1214/12-AOAS535

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR3012523

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
06096524

Keywords
Differential expression EM algorithm hierarchical models random effects uncertainty

Citation

Lund, Steven P.; Nettleton, Dan. The importance of distinct modeling strategies for gene and gene-specific treatment effects in hierarchical models for microarray data. Ann. Appl. Stat. 6 (2012), no. 3, 1118--1133. doi:10.1214/12-AOAS535. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoas/1346418576


Export citation

References

  • Baldi, P. and Long, A. D. (2001). A Bayesian framework for the analysis of microarray expression data: Regularized $t$-test and statistical inferences of gene changes. Bioinformatics 17 509–519.
  • Binder, H., Kirsten, T., Loeffler, M. and Stadle, P. F. (2004). Sensitivity of microarray oligonucleotide probes: Variability and effect of base composition. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 108 18003–18014.
  • Cui, X., Hwang, J. T. G., Qiu, J., Blades, N. J. and Churchill, G. A. (2005). Improved statistical tests for differential gene expression by shrinking variance components estimates. Biostatistics 6 59–75.
  • Irizarry, R. A., Hobbs, B., Collin, F., Beazer-Barclay, Y. D., Antonellis, K. J., Scherf, U. and Speed, T. P. (2003). Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4 249–264.
  • Jensen, S. T., Erkan, I., Arnardottir, E. S. and Small, D. S. (2009). Bayesian testing of many hypotheses $\times$ many genes: A study of sleep apnea. Ann. Appl. Stat. 3 1080–1101.
  • Keleş, S. (2007). Mixture modeling for genome-wide localization of transcription factors. Biometrics 63 10–21, 309.
  • Kendziorski, C. M., Newton, M., Lan, H. and Gould, M. N. (2003). On parametric empirical Bayes methods for comparing multiple groups using replicated gene expression profiles. Stat. Med. 22 3899–3914.
  • Lo, K. and Gottardo, R. (2007). Flexible empirical Bayes models for differential gene expression. Bioinformatics 23 328–335.
  • Lönnstedt, I. and Speed, T. (2002). Replicated microarray data. Statist. Sinica 12 31–46.
  • Lund, S. P. and Nettleton, D. (2012). Supplement to “The importance of distinct modeling strategies for gene and gene-specific treatment effects in hierarchical models for microarray data.” DOI:10.1214/12-AOAS535SUPP.
  • Nettleton, D., Hwang, J. T. G., Caldo, R. A. and Wise, R. P. (2006). Estimating the number of true null hypotheses from a histogram of $p$-values. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 11 337–356.
  • Newton, M. A., Noueiry, A., Sarkar, D. and Ahlquist, P. (2004). Detecting differential gene expression with a semiparametric hierarchical mixture method. Biostatistics 5 155–176.
  • Rossell, D. (2009). Gaga: A parsimonious and flexible model for differential expression analysis. Ann. Appl. Stat. 3 1035–1051.
  • Selinger, D. W., Saxena, R. M., Cheung, K. J., Church, G. M. and Roseno, C. (2003). Global RNA half-life analysis in Escherichia coli reveals positional patterns of transcript degradation. Genome Research 13 216–223.
  • Smyth, G. K. (2004). Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 3 Art. 3, 29 pp. (electronic).
  • Somel, M., Creely, H., Franz, H., Mueller, U., Lachmann, M., Khaitovich, P. and Pääbo, S. (2008). Human and chimpanzee gene expression differences replicated in mice fed different diets. PLoS ONE 3 e1504.
  • Wei, Z. and Li, H. (2007). A Markov random field model for network-based analysis of genomic data. Bioinformatics 23 1537–1544.
  • Wei, Z. and Li, H. (2008). A hidden spatial–temporal Markov random field model for network-based analysis of time course gene expression data. Ann. Appl. Stat. 2 408–429.
  • Wright, G. W. and Simon, R. M. (2003). A random variance model for detection of differential gene expression in small microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 19 2448–2455.
  • Wu, H., Yuan, M., Kaech, S. M. and Halloran, M. E. (2007). A statistical analysis of memory CD8 T cell differentiation: An application of a hierarchical state space model to a short time course microarray experiment. Ann. Appl. Stat. 1 442–458.
  • Yuan, M. (2006). Flexible temporal expression profile modelling using the Gaussian process. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 51 1754–1764.
  • Yuan, M. and Kendziorski, C. (2006a). Hidden Markov models for microarray time course data in multiple biological conditions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 101 1323–1332.
  • Yuan, M. and Kendziorski, C. (2006b). A unified approach for simultaneous gene clustering and differential expression identification. Biometrics 62 1089–1098.

Supplemental materials

  • Supplementary material: Additional evidence supporting need for three-level hierarchy and simulation study details. The correlation across genes present in real microarray data makes directly testing the statistical significance of gene effect variance estimates intractable. We present a simulation study that demonstrates the gene effect variance estimates obtained when analyzing the DC3000 and mouse diet data sets are drastically greater than those that arise when analyzing data simulated without gene effects. We also provide detailed accounts of simulation procedures and results used to evaluate the considered methods. These simulations clearly support our claims regarding the importance of distinctly modeling gene and gene-specific treatment effects and accounting for uncertainty in error variance estimators.