Translator Disclaimer
December 2013 Finite-sample equivalence in statistical models for presence-only data
William Fithian, Trevor Hastie
Ann. Appl. Stat. 7(4): 1917-1939 (December 2013). DOI: 10.1214/13-AOAS667

Abstract

Statistical modeling of presence-only data has attracted much recent attention in the ecological literature, leading to a proliferation of methods, including the inhomogeneous Poisson process (IPP) model, maximum entropy (Maxent) modeling of species distributions and logistic regression models. Several recent articles have shown the close relationships between these methods. We explain why the IPP intensity function is a more natural object of inference in presence-only studies than occurrence probability (which is only defined with reference to quadrat size), and why presence-only data only allows estimation of relative, and not absolute intensity of species occurrence.

All three of the above techniques amount to parametric density estimation under the same exponential family model (in the case of the IPP, the fitted density is multiplied by the number of presence records to obtain a fitted intensity). We show that IPP and Maxent give the exact same estimate for this density, but logistic regression in general yields a different estimate in finite samples. When the model is misspecified—as it practically always is—logistic regression and the IPP may have substantially different asymptotic limits with large data sets. We propose “infinitely weighted logistic regression,” which is exactly equivalent to the IPP in finite samples. Consequently, many already-implemented methods extending logistic regression can also extend the Maxent and IPP models in directly analogous ways using this technique.

Citation

Download Citation

William Fithian. Trevor Hastie. "Finite-sample equivalence in statistical models for presence-only data." Ann. Appl. Stat. 7 (4) 1917 - 1939, December 2013. https://doi.org/10.1214/13-AOAS667

Information

Published: December 2013
First available in Project Euclid: 23 December 2013

zbMATH: 1283.62225
MathSciNet: MR3161707
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/13-AOAS667

Rights: Copyright © 2013 Institute of Mathematical Statistics

JOURNAL ARTICLE
23 PAGES


SHARE
Vol.7 • No. 4 • December 2013
Back to Top