Open Access
February 2019 Rejoinder: Response to Discussions and a Look Ahead
Vincent Dorie, Jennifer Hill, Uri Shalit, Marc Scott, Dan Cervone
Statist. Sci. 34(1): 94-99 (February 2019). DOI: 10.1214/18-STS688

Abstract

Response to discussion of Dorie (2017), in which the authors of that piece express their gratitude to the discussants, rebut some specific criticisms, and argue that the limitations of the 2016 Atlantic Causal Inference Competition represent an exciting opportunity for future competitions in a similar mold.

Citation

Download Citation

Vincent Dorie. Jennifer Hill. Uri Shalit. Marc Scott. Dan Cervone. "Rejoinder: Response to Discussions and a Look Ahead." Statist. Sci. 34 (1) 94 - 99, February 2019. https://doi.org/10.1214/18-STS688

Information

Published: February 2019
First available in Project Euclid: 12 April 2019

zbMATH: 07110681
MathSciNet: MR3938970
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/18-STS688

Keywords: automated algorithms , Causal inference , competition , evaluation , machine learning

Rights: Copyright © 2019 Institute of Mathematical Statistics

Vol.34 • No. 1 • February 2019
Back to Top