Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics

Constructing monomial ideals with a given minimal resolution

Sonja Mapes and Lindsay C. Piechnik

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text


This paper gives a description of various recent results, which construct monomial ideals with a given minimal free resolution. We show that these results are all instances of coordinatizing a finite atomic lattice, as found in~\cite {mapes}. Subsequently, we explain how, in some of these cases \cite {Faridi, Floystad1} where questions still remain, this point of view can be applied. We also prove an equivalence for trees between the notion of \textit {maximal} defined in~\cite {Floystad1} and the notion of being maximal in a Betti stratum.

Article information

Rocky Mountain J. Math., Volume 47, Number 6 (2017), 1963-1985.

First available in Project Euclid: 21 November 2017

Permanent link to this document

Digital Object Identifier

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)

Zentralblatt MATH identifier

Primary: 13D02: Syzygies, resolutions, complexes

Monomial ideal minimal free resolution lcm-lattice cellular resolution Scarf ideal


Mapes, Sonja; Piechnik, Lindsay C. Constructing monomial ideals with a given minimal resolution. Rocky Mountain J. Math. 47 (2017), no. 6, 1963--1985. doi:10.1216/RMJ-2017-47-6-1963.

Export citation


  • D. Bayer, I. Peeva and B. Sturmfels, Monomial resolutions, Math. Res. Lett. 5 (1998), 31–46.
  • D. Bayer and B. Sturmfels, Cellular resolutions, J. reine angew. Math. 502 (1998), 123–140.
  • A. Björner, Topological methods, in Handbook of combinatorics, R. Graham, M. Grötschel and L. Lovász, eds., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1994.
  • T. Clark and S. Mapes, Rigid monomial ideals, J. Comm. Alg. 6 (2014), 33–51.
  • Sara Faridi, Monomial resolutions supported by simplicial trees, J. Comm. Alg. 6 (2014), 347–361.
  • G. Fløystad, Cellular resolutions of Cohen-Macaulay monomial ideals, J. Comm. Alg. 1 (2009), 57–89.
  • Christopher A. Francisco, Jeffery Mermin and Jay Schweig, LCM lattices supporting pure resolutions, PAMS, to appear.
  • Vesselin Gasharov, Irena Peeva and Volkmar Welker, The lcm-lattice in monomial resolutions, Math. Res. Lett. 6 (1999), 521–532.
  • Bogdan Ichim, Lukas Katthän and Julio José Moyano-Fernández, Stanley depth and the lcm-lattice, arXiv:1405.3602v2.
  • Lukas Katthän, Stanley depth and simplicial spanning trees, J. Alg. Combin. 42 (2015), 507–536.
  • Sonja Mapes, Finite atomic lattices and resolutions of monomial ideals, J. Algebra 379 (2013), 259–276.
  • E. Miller, Bernd Sturmfels and Kohji Yanagawa, Generic and cogeneric monomial ideals, J. Symb. Comp. 29 (2000), 691–708.
  • Isabella Novik, Alexander Postnikov and Bernd Sturmfels, Syzygies of oriented matroids, Duke Math. J. 111 (2002), 287–317.
  • Irena Peeva and Mauricio Velasco, Frames and degenerations of monomial resolutions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 363 (2011), 2029–2046.
  • Jeffery Phan, Order properties of monomial ideals and their free resolutions, Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, New York, 2006.
  • Richard P. Stanley, Enumerative combinatorics, Volume 1, Cambr. Stud. Adv. Math. 49, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012.
  • M. Velasco, Minimal free resolutions that are not supported by a CW-complex, J. Algebra 319, (2008), 102–114.