Journal of Symbolic Logic

The Deduction Rule and Linear and Near-Linear Proof Simulations

Maria Luisa Bonet and Samuel R. Buss

Full-text is available via JSTOR, for JSTOR subscribers. Go to this article in JSTOR.


We introduce new proof systems for propositional logic, simple deduction Frege systems, general deduction Frege systems, and nested deduction Frege systems, which augment Frege systems with variants of the deduction rule. We give upper bounds on the lengths of proofs in Frege proof systems compared to lengths in these new systems. As applications we give near-linear simulations of the propositional Gentzen sequent calculus and the natural deduction calculus by Frege proofs. The length of a proof is the number of lines (or formulas) in the proof. A general deduction Frege proof system provides at most quadratic speedup over Frege proof systems. A nested deduction Frege proof system provides at most a nearly linear speedup over Frege system where by "nearly linear" is meant the ratio of proof lengths is $O(\alpha(n))$ where $\alpha$ is the inverse Ackermann function. A nested deduction Frege system can linearly simulate the propositional sequent calculus, the tree-like general deduction Frege calculus, and the natural deduction calculus. Hence a Frege proof system can simulate all those proof systems with proof lengths bounded by $O(n \cdot \alpha(n))$. Also we show that a Frege proof of $n$ lines can be transformed into a tree-like Frege proof of $O(n \log n)$ lines and of height $O(\log n)$. As a corollary of this fact we can prove that natural deduction and sequent calculus tree-like systems simulate Frege systems with proof lengths bounded by $O(n \log n)$.

Article information

J. Symbolic Logic, Volume 58, Issue 2 (1993), 688-709.

First available in Project Euclid: 6 July 2007

Permanent link to this document

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)

Zentralblatt MATH identifier



Bonet, Maria Luisa; Buss, Samuel R. The Deduction Rule and Linear and Near-Linear Proof Simulations. J. Symbolic Logic 58 (1993), no. 2, 688--709.

Export citation