Journal of Applied Mathematics

Simulation of Wellbore Stability during Underbalanced Drilling Operation

Reda Abdel Azim

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text

Abstract

The wellbore stability analysis during underbalance drilling operation leads to avoiding risky problems. These problems include (1) rock failure due to stresses changes (concentration) as a result of losing the original support of removed rocks and (2) wellbore collapse due to lack of support of hydrostatic fluid column. Therefore, this paper presents an approach to simulate the wellbore stability by incorporating finite element modelling and thermoporoelastic environment to predict the instability conditions. Analytical solutions for stress distribution for isotropic and anisotropic rocks are presented to validate the presented model. Moreover, distribution of time dependent shear stresses around the wellbore is presented to be compared with rock shear strength to select appropriate weight of mud for safe underbalance drilling.

Article information

Source
J. Appl. Math., Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 2412397, 12 pages.

Dates
Received: 13 June 2017
Accepted: 2 July 2017
First available in Project Euclid: 19 September 2017

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jam/1505786437

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1155/2017/2412397

Citation

Abdel Azim, Reda. Simulation of Wellbore Stability during Underbalanced Drilling Operation. J. Appl. Math. 2017 (2017), Article ID 2412397, 12 pages. doi:10.1155/2017/2412397. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jam/1505786437


Export citation

References

  • S. Rafieepour, C. Ghotbi, and M. R. Pishvaie, “The effects of various parameters on wellbore stability during drilling through shale formations,” Petroleum Science and Technology, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1275–1285, 2015.
  • G. Chen, M. E. Chenevert, M. M. Sharma, and M. Yu, “A study of wellbore stability in shales including poroelastic, chemical, and thermal effects,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 38, no. 3-4, pp. 167–176, 2003.
  • H. Roshan and S. S. Rahman, “Analysis of pore pressure and stress distribution around a wellbore drilled in chemically active elastoplastic formations,” Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 541–552, 2011.
  • M. Hodge, K. L. Valencia, Z. Chen, and S. S. Rahman, “Analysis of time-dependent wellbore stability of underbalanced wells using a fully coupled poroelastic model,” in Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, ATCE 2006: Focus on the Future, pp. 3274–3278, September 2006.
  • M. Gomar, I. Goodarznia, and S. R. Shadizadeh, “A transient fully coupled thermo-poroelastic finite element analysis of wellbore stability,” Arabian Journal of Geosciences, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 3855–3865, 2014.
  • M. Aslannezhad, A. Khaksar manshad, and H. Jalalifar, “Determination of a safe mud window and analysis of wellbore stability to minimize drilling challenges and non-productive time,” Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 493–503, 2016.
  • S. Salehi, G. Hareland, and R. Nygaard, “Numerical simulations of wellbore stability in under-balanced-drilling wells,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 72, no. 3-4, pp. 229–235, 2010.
  • W. K. Heiduc and S.-W. Wong, “Hydration swelling of water-absorbing rocks: a constitutive model,” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 403–430, 1996.
  • P. McLellan and C. Hawkes, “Borehole stability analysis for underbalanced drilling,” Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 31–38, 2001.
  • M. R. McLean and M. A. Addis, “Wellbore stability: the effect of strength criteria on mud weight recommendations,” in Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, pp. 9–17, September 1990.
  • M. F. Kanfar, Z. Chen, and S. S. Rahman, “Risk-controlled wellbore stability analysis in anisotropic formations,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 134, pp. 214–222, 2015.
  • T. Ma and P. Chen, “A wellbore stability analysis model with chemical-mechanical coupling for shale gas reservoirs,” Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, vol. 26, pp. 72–98, 2015.
  • S. De and K. J. Bathe, “The method of finite spheres,” Computational Mechanics, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 329–345, 2000.
  • G. Kirsch, “Theory of elasticity and application in strength of materials,” Zeitschrift des Vereins Deutscher Ingenieure, vol. 42, no. 29, pp. 797–807, 1898.
  • E. Detournay and A.-D. Cheng, “Poroelastic response of a borehole in a non-hydrostatic stress field,” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1988.
  • H. Stehfest, “Algorithm 368: numerical inversion of Laplace transforms,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 47–49, 1970.
  • B. S. Aadnoy and M. E. Chenevert, “Stability of highly inclined boreholes (includes associated papers 18596 and 18736),” SPE Drilling Engineering, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 364–374, 1987.
  • R. T. Ewy, “Wellbore-stability predictions by use of a modified lade criterion,” SPE Drilling and Completion, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 85–91, 1999. \endinput