Journal of Applied Mathematics

  • J. Appl. Math.
  • Volume 2012, Special Issue (2012), Article ID 917650, 17 pages.

Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Multiphase Flow in Structured Packings

Saeed Shojaee, Seyyed Hossein Hosseini, and Behzad Saeedi Razavi

Full-text: Open access

Abstract

A volume of fluid multiphase flow model was used to investigate the effective area and the created liquid film in the structured packings. The computational results revealed that the gas and liquid flow rates play significant roles in the effective interfacial area of the packing. In particular, the effective area increases as the flow rates of both phases increase. Numerical results were compared with the Brunazzi and SRP models, and a good agreement between them was found. Attention was given to the process of liquid film formation in both two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) models. The current study revealed that computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can be used as an effective tool to provide information on the details of gas and liquid flows in complex packing geometries.

Article information

Source
J. Appl. Math., Volume 2012, Special Issue (2012), Article ID 917650, 17 pages.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 17 October 2012

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jam/1350489034

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1155/2012/917650

Citation

Shojaee, Saeed; Hosseini, Seyyed Hossein; Razavi, Behzad Saeedi. Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Multiphase Flow in Structured Packings. J. Appl. Math. 2012, Special Issue (2012), Article ID 917650, 17 pages. doi:10.1155/2012/917650. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jam/1350489034


Export citation

References

  • Z. Olujic, M. Behrens, L. Colli, and A. Paglianti, “Predicting the efficiency of corrugated sheet structured packings with large specific surface area,” Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 89–96, 2004.
  • E. Brunazzi, A. Paglianti, and L. Petarca, “Design of absorption columns equipped with structured packings,” Chimica & Industria, vol. 78, pp. 459–467, 1996.
  • S. Shetty and R. L. Cerro, “Fundamental liquid flow correlations for the computation of design parameters for ordered packings,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 771–783, 1997.
  • R. H. Weiland, K. R. Ahlgren, and M. Evans, “Mass-transfer characteristics of some structured packings,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1411–1418, 1993.
  • Z. P. Xu, A. Afacan, and K. T. Chuang, “Predicting mass transfer in packed columns containing structured packings,” Chemical Engineering Research and Design, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 91–98, 2000.
  • S. Shojaee, S. H. Hosseini, A. Rafati Saleh, and G. Ahmadi, “Prediction of effective area in structured packings by CFD,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 50, pp. 10833–10842, 2011.
  • C. Van Gulijk, “Using computational fluid dynamics to calculate transversal dispersion in a structured packed bed,” Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. S767–S770, 1998.
  • J. M. Van Baten, J. Ellenberger, and R. Krishna, “Radial and axial dispersion of the liquid phase within a KATAPAK-S(R) structure: experiments vs. CFD simulations,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 813–821, 2001.
  • J. M. van Baten and R. Krishna, “Gas and liquid phase mass transfer within KATAPAK-S structures studied using CFD simulations,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 1531–1536, 2002.
  • C. F. Petre, F. Larachi, I. Iliuta, and B. P. A. Grandjean, “Pressure drop through structured packings: breakdown into the contributing mechanisms by CFD modeling,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 163–177, 2003.
  • F. Larachi, C. F. Petre, I. Iliuta, and B. Grandjean, “Tailoring the pressure drop of structured packings through CFD simulations,” Chemical Engineering and Processing, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 535–541, 2003.
  • B. Szulczewska, I. Zbicinski, and A. Górak, “Liquid flow on structured packing: CFD simulation and experimental study,” Chemical Engineering and Technology, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 580–584, 2003.
  • L. Raynal, C. Boyer, and J. P. Ballaguet, “Liquid holdup and pressure drop determination in structured packing with CFD simulations,” Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 871–879, 2004.
  • A. Ataki and H. J. Bart, “Experimental and CFD simulation study for the wetting of a structured packing element with liquids,” Chemical Engineering and Technology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 336–347, 2006.
  • M. Haghshenas Fard, M. Zivdar, R. Rahimi et al., “CFD simulation of mass transfer efficiency and pressure drop in a structured packed distillation column,” Chemical Engineering and Technology, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 854–861, 2007.
  • B. Mahr and D. Mewes, “Two-phase flow in structured packings: modeling and calculation on a macroscopic scale,” AIChE Journal, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 614–626, 2008.
  • M. R. Khosravi Nikou and M. R. Ehsani, “Turbulence models application on CFD simulation of hydrodynamics, heat and mass transfer in a structured packing,” International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1211–1219, 2008.
  • J. Fernandes, P. C. Simões, J. P. B. Mota, and E. Saatdjian, “Application of CFD in the study of supercritical fluid extraction with structured packing: dry pressure drop calculations,” Journal of Su-percritical Fluids, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2008.
  • J. Fernandes, P. F. Lisboa, P. C. Simões, J. P. B. Mota, and E. Saatdjian, “Application of CFD in the study of supercritical fluid extraction with structured packing: wet pressure drop calculations,” Journal of Supercritical Fluids, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 61–68, 2009.
  • J. U. Brackbill, “A continuum method for modeling surface tension,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 335–354, 1992.
  • A. Rafati Saleh, S. H. Hosseini, S. Shojaee, and G. Ahmadi, “CFD studies of pressure drop and increasing capacity in mellapakplus 752.Y structured packing,” Chemical Engineering & Technology, vol. 34, pp. 1402–1412, 2011.
  • J. A. Rocha, J. L. Bravo, and J. R. Fair, “Distillation columns containing structured packings: a comprehensive model for their performance. 1. Hydraulic models,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 641–651, 1993.
  • S. Y. Cho, Y. Y. Lee, and S. J. Kim, “A study on characteristics of a modern structured packing,” Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 313–319, 1995.
  • I. Iliuta and F. Larachi, “Mechanistic model for structured-packing-containing columns: irrigated pressure drop, liquid holdup, and packing fractional wetted area,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 40, no. 23, pp. 5140–5146, 2001.
  • E. Brunazzi, G. Nardini, A. Paglianti, and L. Petarca, “Interfacial area of Mellapak packing: absorption of 1,1,1-trichloroethane by Genosorb 300,” Chemical Engineering & Technology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 248–255, 1995.
  • M. Henriques De Brito, U. Von Stockar, A. Menendez Bangerter, P. Bomio, and M. Laso, “Effective mass-transfer area in a pilot plant column equipped with structured packings and with ceramic rings,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 647–656, 1994.
  • R. E. Tsai, A. F. Seibert, R. B. Eldridge, and G. T. Rochelle, “Influence of viscosity and surface tension on the effective mass transfer area of structured packing,” Energy Procedia, vol. 1, pp. 1197–1204, 2009.
  • S. Aferka, A. Viva, E. Brunazzi, P. Marchot, M. Crine, and D. Toye, “Tomographic measurement of liquid hold up and effective interfacial area distributions in a column packed with high performance structured packings,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 66, no. 14, pp. 3413–3422, 2011.
  • G. Q. Wang, X. G. Yuan, and K. T. Yu, “A method for calculating effective interfacial area of structured packed distillation columns under elevated pressures,” Chemical Engineering and Processing, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 691–697, 2006.
  • J. R. Fair, A. F. Seibert, M. Behrens, P. P. Saraber, and Z. Olujic, “Structured packing performance–-experimental evaluation of two predictive models,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1788–1796, 2000.