International Statistical Review
- Internat. Statist. Rev.
- Volume 72, Number 3 (2004), 335-336.
I welcome the comments that have been made by Professor Shafer. He makes a number of important points, however, I shall confine this rejoinder by addressing only a selected number of these points. In particular, I would like to use this opportunity to briefly comment on how well I feel the work that has been done by those in the `imprecise probabilities' community, tackles the specific shortcomings of the standard Bayesian approach that have been highlighted in my article.
Internat. Statist. Rev., Volume 72, Number 3 (2004), 335-336.
First available in Project Euclid: 8 December 2004
Permanent link to this document
Bowater, Russell J. Rejoinder. Internat. Statist. Rev. 72 (2004), no. 3, 335--336. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.isr/1102516475