International Statistical Review

Comments on ``A Foundational Justification for a Weighted Likelihood Approach to Inference''

Glenn Shafer

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text

Abstract

Russell Bowater uses non-additive probability to interpret weighted likelihood. As I have written a great deal about non-additive probability, the editor has asked me to comment.

Article information

Source
Internat. Statist. Rev., Volume 72, Number 3 (2004), 331-334.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 8 December 2004

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.isr/1102516474

Citation

Shafer, Glenn. Comments on ``A Foundational Justification for a Weighted Likelihood Approach to Inference''. Internat. Statist. Rev. 72 (2004), no. 3, 331--334. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.isr/1102516474


Export citation

References

  • [1] Bayer, R, Ed. (1951). Congrès International de Philsophie des Sciences, Paris, 1949; IV: Calcul des Probabilités. In {Actualités Scientifiques et Industrielles}, No. 1146. Paris: Hermann.
  • [2] Bernard, J.-M., Seidenfeld, T. & Zaffalon, M. (2003). ISIPTA '03. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and their Applications. Waterloo, Canada: Carleton Scientific.
  • [3] Dempster, A.P. (1968). A generalization of {B}ayesian inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 30, 205-247.
  • [4] Edwards, A.W.F. (1972). Likelihood. Second edition 1992. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
  • [5] Fisher, R.A. (1973). Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference, third edition. First edition 1956, second 1959. New York: MacMillan.
  • [6] Fortet, R.M. (1951). Faut-il élargir les axiomes du calcul des probabilités?. In {Actualités Scientifiques et Industrielles}, No. 1146 Ed. R. Bayer, pp.35-47. Paris: Hermann.
  • [7] Shafer, G. (1976). A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • [8] Shafer, G. (1978). Non-additive probabilities in the work of {B}ernoulli and {L}ambert. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 19, 309-370.
  • [9] Shafer, G., Gillett, P.R. & Scherl, R.B. (2003). A new understanding of subjective probability and its generalization to lower and upper prevision. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 33, 1-49.
  • [10] Shafer, G. & Vovk, V. (2001). Probability and Finance: It's Only a Game. New York: Wiley.
  • [11] Shafer, G. & Vovk, V. (2003). The sources of {K}olmogorov's {Grundbegriffe}. Working Paper \# 4,\newline www.probabilityandfinance.com.
  • [12] Smith, C.A.B. (1965). Personal probabilities and statistical analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 128, 469-499.
  • [13] Vovk, V. & Shafer, G. (2002). The game-theoretic capital asset pricing model. Working Paper \# 1,\newline www.probabilityandfinance.com.
  • [14] Walley, P. (1991). Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. London: Chapman and Hall.
  • [15] Williams, P.M. (1976). Indeterminate Probabilities. In Formal Methods in the Methodology of Empirical Sciences, Eds. M. Przeł{e}\c{c}ki, K. Szaniawski and R. Wojcíckí, pp.229-246. Ossolineum & Reidel.