Electronic Journal of Statistics
- Electron. J. Statist.
- Volume 8, Number 1 (2014), 817-840.
The cost of using exact confidence intervals for a binomial proportion
When computing a confidence interval for a binomial proportion $p$ one must choose between using an exact interval, which has a coverage probability of at least $1-\alpha$ for all values of $p$, and a shorter approximate interval, which may have lower coverage for some $p$ but that on average has coverage equal to $1-\alpha$. We investigate the cost of using the exact one and two-sided Clopper–Pearson confidence intervals rather than shorter approximate intervals, first in terms of increased expected length and then in terms of the increase in sample size required to obtain a desired expected length. Using asymptotic expansions, we also give a closed-form formula for determining the sample size for the exact Clopper–Pearson methods. For two-sided intervals, our investigation reveals an interesting connection between the frequentist Clopper–Pearson interval and Bayesian intervals based on noninformative priors.
Electron. J. Statist., Volume 8, Number 1 (2014), 817-840.
First available in Project Euclid: 16 June 2014
Permanent link to this document
Digital Object Identifier
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
Zentralblatt MATH identifier
Thulin, Måns. The cost of using exact confidence intervals for a binomial proportion. Electron. J. Statist. 8 (2014), no. 1, 817--840. doi:10.1214/14-EJS909. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ejs/1402927499