An implication of Gödel's incompleteness theorem II: Not referring to the validity of oneself's assertion

Abstract

In [10] we reviewed Gödel's incompleteness theorem and gave a new proof along with an application which leads to a contradiction when applying the Gödel's discussion to the set theory ZFC itself. We stated a possible solution to avoid contradiction by removing the self-reference by appealing to the axiomatic formulation of a theory with referring to its validity in no explicit ways. We will in this paper give a more specific possible solution that one can avoid the Gödel type self-contradiction by preventing oneself from telling anything definite about the validity of oneself's assertion.