Open Access
2009 Comments on high-order integrators embedded within integral deferred correction methods
Andrew Christlieb, Benjamin Ong, Jing-Mei Qiu
Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 4(1): 27-56 (2009). DOI: 10.2140/camcos.2009.4.27

Abstract

A class of novel deferred correction methods, integral deferred correction (IDC) methods, is studied. This class of methods is an extension of ideas introduced by Dutt, Greengard and Rokhlin on spectral deferred correction (SDC) methods for solving ordinary differential equations (ODEs). The novel nature of this class of defect correction methods is that the correction of the defect is carried out using an accurate integral form of the residual instead of the more familiar differential form. As a family of methods, these schemes are capable of matching the efficiency of popular high-order RK methods.

The smoothness of the error vector associated with an IDC method is an important indicator of the order of convergence that can be expected from a scheme (Christlieb, Ong, and Qiu; Hansen and Strain; Skeel). It is demonstrated that embedding an r-th order integrator in the correction loop of an IDC method does not always result in an r-th order increase in accuracy. Examples include IDC methods constructed using non-self-starting multistep integrators, and IDC methods constructed using a nonuniform distribution of quadrature nodes.

Additionally, the integral deferred correction concept is reposed as a framework to generate high-order Runge–Kutta (RK) methods; specifically, we explain how the prediction and correction loops can be incorporated as stages of a high-order RK method. This alternate point of view allows us to utilize standard methods for quantifying the performance (efficiency, accuracy and stability) of integral deferred correction schemes. It is found that IDC schemes constructed using uniformly distributed nodes and high-order integrators are competitive in terms of efficiency with IDC schemes constructed using Gauss–Lobatto nodes and forward Euler integrators. With respect to regions of absolute stability, however, IDC methods constructed with uniformly distributed nodes and high-order integrators are far superior. It is observed that as the order of the embedded integrator increases, the stability region of the IDC method increases.

Citation

Download Citation

Andrew Christlieb. Benjamin Ong. Jing-Mei Qiu. "Comments on high-order integrators embedded within integral deferred correction methods." Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 4 (1) 27 - 56, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2140/camcos.2009.4.27

Information

Received: 13 November 2008; Revised: 20 January 2009; Accepted: 15 March 2009; Published: 2009
First available in Project Euclid: 20 December 2017

zbMATH: 1167.65389
MathSciNet: MR2516213
Digital Object Identifier: 10.2140/camcos.2009.4.27

Subjects:
Primary: 65L05 , 65L06 , 65L20 , 65L70
Secondary: 65B05

Keywords: Accuracy , efficiency , integral deferred correction methods , multistage methods , multistep methods , Runge–Kutta methods , spectral deferred correction methods , stability

Rights: Copyright © 2009 Mathematical Sciences Publishers

Vol.4 • No. 1 • 2009
MSP
Back to Top