March 2008 Logicality and invariance
Denis Bonnay
Bull. Symbolic Logic 14(1): 29-68 (March 2008). DOI: 10.2178/bsl/1208358843

Abstract

This paper deals with the problem of giving a principled characterization of the class of logical constants. According to the so-called Tarski—Sher thesis, an operation is logical iff it is invariant under permutation. In the model-theoretic tradition, this criterion has been widely accepted as giving a necessary condition for an operation to be logical. But it has been also widely criticized on the account that it counts too many operations as logical, failing thus to provide a sufficient condition. Our aim is to solve this problem of overgeneration by modifying the invariance criterion. We introduce a general notion of invariance under a similarity relation and present the connection between similarity relations and classes of invariant operations. The next task is to isolate a similarity relation well-suited for a definition of logicality. We argue that the standard arguments in favor of invariance under permutation, which rely on the generality and the formality of logic, should be modified. The revised arguments are shown to support an alternative to Tarski’s criterion, according to which an operation is logical iff it is invariant under potential isomorphism.

Citation

Download Citation

Denis Bonnay. "Logicality and invariance." Bull. Symbolic Logic 14 (1) 29 - 68, March 2008. https://doi.org/10.2178/bsl/1208358843

Information

Published: March 2008
First available in Project Euclid: 16 April 2008

zbMATH: 1146.03002
MathSciNet: MR2395046
Digital Object Identifier: 10.2178/bsl/1208358843

Rights: Copyright © 2008 Association for Symbolic Logic

JOURNAL ARTICLE
40 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

Vol.14 • No. 1 • March 2008
Back to Top