Project Euclid

References

• [1] Andradóttir, S., Heyman, D.P. and Ott, T.J. (1993). Variance reduction through smoothing and control variates for Markov chain simulations. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. 3 167–189.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0846.60071
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1145/174153.174154
  
• [2] Assaraf, R. and Caffarel, M. (1999). Zero-variance principle for Monte Carlo algorithms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 4682–4685.
• [3] Assaraf, R. and Caffarel, M. (2003). Zero-variance zero-bias principle for observables in quantum Monte Carlo: Application to forces. J. Chem. Phys. 119 10536.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0992.81002
  
• [4] Azaïs, R., Delyon, B. and Portier, F. (2016). Integral estimation based on Markovian design. Available at arXiv:1609.01165.
  arXiv: 1609.01165
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1345.60013
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.3150/15-BEJ725
  Project Euclid: euclid.bj/1462297679
  
• [5] Bahvalov, N.S. (1959). Approximate computation of multiple integrals. Vestnik Moskov. Univ. Ser. Mat. Meh. Astr. Fiz. Him. 1959 3–18.
• [6] Berlinet, A. and Thomas-Agnan, C. (2004). Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces in Probability and Statistics. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1145.62002
  
• [7] Briol, F.-X., Oates, C.J., Cockayne, J., Chen, W.Y. and Girolami, M. (2017). On the sampling problem for kernel quadrature. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning.
• [8] Briol, F.-X., Oates, C.J., Girolami, M., Osborne, M.A. and Sejdinovic, D. (2017). Probabilistic integration: A role in statistical computation? Available at arXiv:1512.00933.
  arXiv: 1512.00933
  
• [9] Carpenter, B., Hoffman, M.D., Brubaker, M., Lee, D., Li, P. and Betancourt, M. (2015). The Stan math library: Reverse-mode automatic differentiation in C$++$. Available at arXiv:1509.07164.
  arXiv: 1509.07164
  
• [10] Chwialkowski, K., Strathmann, H. and Gretton, A. (2016). A kernel test of goodness of fit. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning.
• [11] Cockayne, J., Oates, C.J., Sullivan, T. and Girolami, M. (2016). Probabilistic numerical methods for PDE-constrained Bayesian inverse problems. In Proceedings of the 36th International Workshop on Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering.
• [12] Cockayne, J., Oates, C.J., Sullivan, T. and Girolami, M. (2017). Probabilistic meshless methods for Bayesian inverse problems. Available at arXiv:1605.07811.
  arXiv: 1605.07811
  
• [13] Cockayne, J., Oates, C.J., Sullivan, T. and Girolami, M. (2017). Bayesian probabilistic numerical methods. Available at arXiv:1702.03673.
  arXiv: 1702.03673
  
• [14] Dellaportas, P. and Kontoyiannis, I. (2012). Control variates for estimation based on reversible Markov chain Monte Carlo samplers. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 74 133–161.
• [15] Delyon, B. and Portier, F. (2016). Integral approximation by kernel smoothing. Bernoulli 22 2177–2208.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1345.60013
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.3150/15-BEJ725
  Project Euclid: euclid.bj/1462297679
  
• [16] Dick, J., Gantner, R.N., Gia, Q.T.L. and Schwab, C. (2016). Higher order quasi-Monte Carlo integration for Bayesian estimation. Available at arXiv:1602.07363.
  arXiv: 1602.07363
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1375.65169
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1142/S021820251750021X
  
• [17] Gorham, J., Duncan, A.B., Vollmer, S.J. and Mackey, L. (2016). Measuring sample quality with diffusions. Available at arXiv:1611.06972.
  arXiv: 1611.06972
  
• [18] Gorham, J. and Mackey, L. (2015). Measuring sample quality with Stein’s method. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.
• [19] Gorham, J. and Mackey, L. (2017). Measuring sample quality with kernels. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning.
• [20] Hammer, H. and Tjelmeland, H. (2008). Control variates for the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. Scand. J. Stat. 35 400–414.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1199.65018
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/j.1467-9469.2008.00601.x
  
• [21] Kanagawa, M., Sriperumbudur, B.K. and Fukumizu, K. (2016). Convergence guarantees for kernel-based quadrature rules in misspecified settings. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.
• [22] Li, W., Chen, R. and Tan, Z. (2016). Efficient sequential Monte Carlo with multiple proposals and control variates. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 111 298–313.
• [23] Liu, Q. and Lee, J.D. (2017). Black-box importance sampling. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics.
• [24] Liu, Q., Lee, J.D. and Jordan, M.I. (2016). A kernelized Stein discrepancy for goodness-of-fit tests and model evaluation. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning.
• [25] Maclaurin, D., Duvenaud, D., Johnson, M. and Adams, R.P. (2015). Autograd: Reverse-mode differentiation of native Python. Available at http://github.com/HIPS/autograd+.
• [26] Meyn, S.P. and Tweedie, R.L. (2009). Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1165.60001
  
• [27] Micchelli, C.A., Xu, Y. and Zhang, H. (2006). Universal kernels. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 7 2651–2667.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1222.68266
  
• [28] Migliorati, G., Nobile, F. and Tempone, R. (2015). Convergence estimates in probability and in expectation for discrete least squares with noisy evaluations at random points. J. Multivariate Anal. 142 167–182.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1327.41004
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2015.08.009
  
• [29] Mijatović, A. and Vogrinc, J. (2015). On the Poisson equation for Metropolis–Hastings chains. Available at arXiv:1511.07464.
  arXiv: 1511.07464
  
• [30] Mijatović, A. and Vogrinc, J. (2017). Asymptotic variance for random walk Metropolis chains in high dimensions: Logarithmic growth via the Poisson equation. Available at arXiv:1707.08510.
  arXiv: 1707.08510
  
• [31] Mira, A., Solgi, R. and Imparato, D. (2013). Zero variance Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian estimators. Stat. Comput. 23 653–662.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1322.62212
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/s11222-012-9344-6
  
• [32] Narcowich, F.J., Ward, J.D. and Wendland, H. (2005). Sobolev bounds on functions with scattered zeros, with applications to radial basis function surface fitting. Math. Comp. 74 743–763.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1063.41013
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-04-01708-9
  
• [33] Niederreiter, H. (2010). Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods. New York: Wiley.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0603.65043
  
• [34] Oates, C.J., Cockayne, J., Briol, F.-X. and Girolami, M. (2019). Supplement to “Convergence rates for a class of estimators based on Stein’s method.” DOI:10.3150/17-BEJ1016SUPP.
• [35] Oates, C.J., Girolami, M. and Chopin, N. (2017). Control functionals for Monte Carlo integration. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 79 695–718.
• [36] Oates, C.J., Papamarkou, T. and Girolami, M. (2016). The controlled thermodynamic integral for Bayesian model evidence evaluation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 111 634–645.
• [37] Robert, C. and Casella, G. (2013). Monte Carlo Statistical Methods. New York: Springer.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1096.62003
  
• [38] Roberts, G.O. and Rosenthal, J.S. (1998). On convergence rates of Gibbs samplers for uniform distributions. Ann. Appl. Probab. 8 1291–1302.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0935.60054
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aoap/1028903381
  Project Euclid: euclid.aoap/1028903381
  
• [39] Rubinstein, R.Y. and Marcus, R. (1985). Efficiency of multivariate control variates in Monte Carlo simulation. Oper. Res. 33 661–677.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0606.65100
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1287/opre.33.3.661
  
• [40] Schölkopf, B., Herbrich, R. and Smola, A.J. (2001). A generalized representer theorem. Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 2111 416–426.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0992.68088
  
• [41] Stein, C. (1972). A bound for the error in the normal approximation to the distribution of a sum of dependent random variables. In Proceedings of the Sixth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (Univ. California, Berkeley, Calif., 1970/1971), Vol. II: Probability Theory 583–602. Berkeley, CA: Univ. California Press.
• [42] Steinwart, I. (2001). On the influence of the kernel on the consistency of support vector machines. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2 67–93.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1009.68143
  
• [43] Stuart, A.M. and Teckentrup, A.L. (2018). Posterior consistency for Gaussian process approximations of Bayesian posterior distributions. Math. Comp. To appear.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 06825244
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1090/mcom/3244
  
• [44] Wendland, H. (1995). Piecewise polynomial, positive definite and compactly supported radial functions of minimal degree. Adv. Comput. Math. 4 389–396.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0838.41014
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/BF02123482
  
• [45] Wendland, H. (2004). Scattered Data Approximation. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1185.65022