• Bernoulli
  • Volume 23, Number 4B (2017), 2988-3020.

Baxter’s inequality and sieve bootstrap for random fields

Marco Meyer, Carsten Jentsch, and Jens-Peter Kreiss

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text


The concept of the autoregressive (AR) sieve bootstrap is investigated for the case of spatial processes in $\mathbb{Z}^{2}$. This procedure fits AR models of increasing order to the given data and, via resampling of the residuals, generates bootstrap replicates of the sample. The paper explores the range of validity of this resampling procedure and provides a general check criterion which allows to decide whether the AR sieve bootstrap asymptotically works for a specific statistic of interest or not. The criterion may be applied to a large class of stationary spatial processes. As another major contribution of this paper, a weighted Baxter-inequality for spatial processes is provided. This result yields a rate of convergence for the finite predictor coefficients, i.e. the coefficients of finite-order AR model fits, towards the autoregressive coefficients which are inherent to the underlying process under mild conditions. The developed check criterion is applied to some particularly interesting statistics like sample autocorrelations and standardized sample variograms. A simulation study shows that the procedure performs very well compared to normal approximations as well as block bootstrap methods in finite samples.

Article information

Bernoulli, Volume 23, Number 4B (2017), 2988-3020.

Received: June 2015
Revised: February 2016
First available in Project Euclid: 23 May 2017

Permanent link to this document

Digital Object Identifier

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)

Zentralblatt MATH identifier

autoregression bootstrap random fields


Meyer, Marco; Jentsch, Carsten; Kreiss, Jens-Peter. Baxter’s inequality and sieve bootstrap for random fields. Bernoulli 23 (2017), no. 4B, 2988--3020. doi:10.3150/16-BEJ835.

Export citation


  • [1] Alonso, A.M., Peña, D. and Romo, J. (2002). Forecasting time series with sieve bootstrap. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 100 1–11.
  • [2] Basu, S. and Reinsel, G.C. (1992). A note on properties of spatial Yule–Walker estimators. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 41 243–255.
  • [3] Basu, S. and Reinsel, G.C. (1993). Properties of the spatial unilateral first-order ARMA model. Adv. in Appl. Probab. 25 631–648.
  • [4] Baxter, G. (1962). An asymptotic result for the finite predictor. Math. Scand. 10 137–144.
  • [5] Baxter, G. (1963). A norm inequality for a “finite-section” Wiener–Hopf equation. Illinois J. Math. 7 97–103.
  • [6] Besag, J.E. (1972). On the correlation structure of some two-dimensional stationary processes. Biometrika 59 43–48.
  • [7] Bhatt, S.J. and Dedania, H.V. (2003). Beurling algebra analogues of the classical theorems of Wiener and Lévy on absolutely convergent Fourier series. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. 113 179–182.
  • [8] Brockwell, P.J. and Davis, R.A. (1991). Time Series: Theory and Methods, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
  • [9] Bühlmann, P. (1997). Sieve bootstrap for time series. Bernoulli 3 123–148.
  • [10] Chang, Y. and Park, J.Y. (2003). A sieve bootstrap for the test of a unit root. J. Time Series Anal. 24 379–400.
  • [11] Cheng, R. and Pourahmadi, M. (1993). Baxter’s inequality and convergence of finite predictors of multivariate stochastic processes. Probab. Theory Related Fields 95 115–124.
  • [12] Choi, B. and Politis, D.N. (2007). Modeling 2-D AR processes with various regions of support. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 55 1696–1707.
  • [13] Cressie, N.A.C. (1993). Statistics for Spatial Data. New York: Wiley.
  • [14] Freedman, D. (1984). On bootstrapping two-stage least-squares estimates in stationary linear models. Ann. Statist. 12 827–842.
  • [15] Gröchenig, K. (2007). Weight functions in time-frequency analysis. In Pseudo-Differential Operators: Partial Differential Equations and Time-Frequency Analysis (L. Rodino et al., eds.) Fields Inst. Commun. 52 343–366. Providence, RI: Amer. Math. Soc.
  • [16] Guyon, X. (1982). Parameter estimation for a stationary process on a $d$-dimensional lattice. Biometrika 69 95–105.
  • [17] Guyon, X. (1995). Random Fields on a Network – Modeling, Statistics, and Applications. New York: Springer.
  • [18] Ha, E. and Newton, H.J. (1993). The bias of estimators of causal spatial autoregressive processes. Biometrika 80 242–245.
  • [19] Hall, P. (1985). Resampling a coverage pattern. Stochastic Process. Appl. 20 231–246.
  • [20] Hannan, E.J. and Deistler, M. (1988). The Statistical Theory of Linear Systems. New York: Wiley.
  • [21] Helson, H. and Lowdenslager, D. (1958). Prediction theory and Fourier series in several variables. Acta Math. 99 165–202.
  • [22] Kreiss, J.-P. (1988). Asymptotical inference for a class of stochastic processes. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Hamburg.
  • [23] Kreiss, J.-P. (1992). Bootstrap procedures for $\mathrm{AR}(\infty)$-processes. In Bootstrapping and Related Techniques (Trier, 1990) (K.H. Jöckel, G. Rothe and W. Sender, eds.) Lecture Notes in Econom. and Math. Systems 376 107–113. Berlin: Springer.
  • [24] Kreiss, J.-P., Paparoditis, E. and Politis, D.N. (2011). On the range of validity of the autoregressive sieve bootstrap. Ann. Statist. 39 2103–2130.
  • [25] Künsch, H.R. (1989). The jackknife and the bootstrap for general stationary observations. Ann. Statist. 17 1217–1241.
  • [26] Lütkepohl, H. (1996). Handbook of Matrices. Chichester: Wiley.
  • [27] Meyer, M., Jentsch, C. and Kreiss, J.-P. (2015). Baxter’s inequality and sieve bootstrap for random fields. Working Paper ECON 15–06, Department of Economics, University of Mannheim, Germany. Available at
  • [28] Meyer, M. and Kreiss, J.-P. (2015). On the vector autoregressive sieve bootstrap. J. Time Series Anal. 36 377–397.
  • [29] Nordman, D.J. and Lahiri, S.N. (2004). On optimal spatial subsample size for variance estimation. Ann. Statist. 32 1981–2027.
  • [30] Nordman, D.J., Lahiri, S.N. and Fridley, B.L. (2007). Optimal block size for variance estimation by a spatial block bootstrap method. Sankhyā 69 468–493.
  • [31] Paparoditis, E. (1996). Bootstrapping autoregressive and moving average parameter estimates of infinite order vector autoregressive processes. J. Multivariate Anal. 57 277–296.
  • [32] Paparoditis, E. and Politis, D.N. (2005). Bootstrapping unit root tests for autoregressive time series. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 100 545–553.
  • [33] Paparoditis, E. and Streitberg, B. (1992). Order identification statistics in stationary autoregressive moving-average models: Vector autocorrelations and the bootstrap. J. Time Series Anal. 13 415–434.
  • [34] Politis, D.N. and Romano, J.P. (1993). Nonparametric resampling for homogeneous strong mixing random fields. J. Multivariate Anal. 47 301–328.
  • [35] Pourahmadi, M. (2001). Foundations of Time Series Analysis and Prediction Theory. New York: Wiley.
  • [36] Smeekes, S. and Urbain, J.-P. (2013). On the applicability of the sieve bootstrap in time series panels. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 76 139–151.
  • [37] Tjøstheim, D. (1978). Statistical spatial series modelling. Adv. in Appl. Probab. 10 130–154.
  • [38] Tjøstheim, D. (1981). Autoregressive modeling and spectral analysis of array data in the plane. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 19 15–24.
  • [39] Tjøstheim, D. (1983). Statistical spatial series modelling. II. Some further results on unilateral lattice processes. Adv. in Appl. Probab. 15 562–584.
  • [40] Whittle, P. (1954). On stationary processes in the plane. Biometrika 41 434–449.
  • [41] Zhu, J. and Lahiri, S.N. (2007). Bootstrapping the empirical distribution function of a spatial process. Stat. Inference Stoch. Process. 10 107–145.
  • [42] Zygmund, A. (2002). Trigonometric Series. Vol. I, II, 3rd ed. Cambridge Mathematical Library. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.