Project Euclid

References

• [1] Chiu, C.Y., Douglas, J.A. and Li, X. (2009). Cluster analysis for cognitive diagnosis: Theory and applications. Psychometrika 74 633–665.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2565331
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/s11336-009-9125-0
  
• [2] de la Torre, J. (2008). An empirically-based method of $Q$-matrix balidation for the DINA model: Development and applications. Journal of Educational Measurement 45 343–362.
• [3] de la Torre, J. (2008). The generalized DINA model. In International Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Durham, NH.
• [4] de la Torre, J. and Douglas, J.A. (2004). Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis. Psychometrika 69 333–353.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2272454
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/BF02295640
  
• [5] DiBello, L.V., Stout, W.F. and Roussos, L. (1995). Unified cognitive psychometric assessment likelihood-based classification techniques. In Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment 361–390. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• [6] Gelman, A., Jakulin, A., Pittau, M.G. and Su, Y.S. (2008). A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models. Ann. Appl. Stat. 2 1360–1383.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2655663
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/08-AOAS191
  Project Euclid: euclid.aoas/1231424214
  
• [7] Hartz, S.M. (2002). A Bayesian framework for the unified model for assessing cognitive abilities: Blending theory with practicality. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Illinois, Urbana–Champaign.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2703174
  
• [8] Henson, R. and Douglas, J. (2005). Test construction for cognitive diagnosis. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 29 262–277.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2142701
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1177/0146621604272623
  
• [9] Henson, R., Roussos, L., Douglas, J. and He, X. (2008). Cognitive diagnostic attribute-level discrimination indices. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 32 275–288.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2432210
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1177/0146621607302478
  
• [10] Henson, R.A. and Templin, J.L. (2005). Hierarchical log-linear modeling of the skill joint distribution. Technical report, External Diagnostic Research Group.
• [11] Junker, B.W. (1999). Some statistical models and computational methods that may be useful for cognitively-relevant assessment. Technical report. Available at http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~brian/nrc/cfa/documents/final.pdf.
• [12] Junker, B.W. and Sijtsma, K. (2001). Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 25 258–272.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1842982
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1177/01466210122032064
  
• [13] Leighton, J.P., Gierl, M.J. and Hunka, S.M. (2004). The attribute hierarchy model for cognitive assessment: A variation on Tatsuoka’s rule-space approach. Journal of Educational Measurement 41 205–237.
• [14] Liu, Y., Douglas, J.A. and Henson, R. (2007). Testing person fit in cognitive diagnosis. In The Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), Chicago, IL.
• [15] Maris, E. (1999). Estimating multiple classification latent class models. Psychometrika 64 187–212.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1700708
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/BF02294535
  
• [16] Reckase, M.D. (1990). Unidimensional data from multidimensional tests and multidimensional data from unidimensional tests. In The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA, April 16–20.
• [17] Reckase, M.D. (2009). Multidimensional Item Response Theory. New York: Springer.
• [18] Roussos, L., DiBello, L.V., Stout, W., Hartz, S., Henson, R. and Templin, J. (2007). The fusion model skills diagnosis system. In Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment for Education: Theory and Practice (J. P. Leighton and M. J. Gierl, eds.) 275–318. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
• [19] Roussos, L.A., Templin, J.L. and Henson, R.A. (2007). Skills diagnosis using IRT-based latent class models. Journal of Educational Measurement 44 293–311.
• [20] Rupp, A.A. (2002). Feature selection for choosing and assembling measurement models: A building-block-based organization. Psychometrika 2 311–360.
• [21] Rupp, A.A. and Templin, J.L. (2008). Effects of $Q$-matrix misspecification on parameter estimates and misclassification rates in the DINA model. Educational and Psychological Measurement 68 78–98.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2416509
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1177/0013164407301545
  
• [22] Rupp, A.A. and Templin, J.L. (2008). Unique characteristics of diagnostic classification models: A comprehensive review of the current state-of-the-art. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspective 6 219–262.
• [23] Rupp, A.A., Templin, J.L. and Henson, R.A. (2010). Diagnostic Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications. New York: Guilford Press.
• [24] Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Statist. 6 461–464.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR468014
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
  Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1176344136
  
• [25] Stout, W. (2007). Skills diagnosis using IRT-based continuous latent trait models. Journal of Educational Measurement 44 313–324.
• [26] Tatsuoka, C. (2002). Data analytic methods for latent partially ordered classification models. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. C 51 337–350.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1920801
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/1467-9876.00272
  
• [27] Tatsuoka, K.K. (1983). Rule space: An approch for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement 20 345–354.
• [28] Tatsuoka, K.K. (1985). A probabilistic model for diagnosing misconceptions in the pattern classification approach. Journal of Educational Statistics 12 55–73.
• [29] Tatsuoka, K.K. (2009). Cognitive Assessment: An Introduction to the Rule Space Method. Florence, KY: Routledge.
• [30] Templin, J., He, X., Roussos, L. and Stout, W. (2003). The pseudo-item method: A simple technique for analysis of polytomous data with the fusion model. Technical report, External Diagnostic Research Group.
• [31] Templin, J.L. (2006). CDM: Cognitive diagnosis modeling with Mplus. Computer software. Available at http://jtemplin.coe.uga.edu/research/.
• [32] Templin, J.L. and Henson, R.A. (2006). Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models. Psychol. Methods 11 287–305.
• [33] von Davier, M. (2005). A general diagnosis model applied to language testing data. Research report, Educational Testing Service.