Project Euclid

References

• Apanasovich, T.V., Ruppert, D., Lupton, J.R., Popovic, N., Turner, N.D., Chapkin, R.S. and Carroll, R.J. (2008). Aberrant crypt foci and semiparametric modeling of correlated binary data. Biometrics 64 490–500, 667.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2432419
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00892.x
  
• Barndorff-Nielsen, O.E. and Cox, D.R. (1994). Inference and Asymptotics. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 52. London: Chapman & Hall.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1317097
  
• Besag, J. (1974). Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 36 192–236. With discussion by D.R. Cox, A.G. Hawkes, P. Clifford, P. Whittle, K. Ord, R. Mead, J.M. Hammersley, and M.S. Bartlett and with a reply by the author.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR373208
  
• Besag, J. (1975). Statistical analysis of non-lattice data. Statistician 24 179–195.
• Bjørnstad, J.F. (1990). Predictive likelihood: A review. Statist. Sci. 5 242–265. With comments and a rejoinder by the author.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1062578
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/ss/1177012175
  Project Euclid: euclid.ss/1177012175
  
• Brazzale, A.R., Davison, A.C. and Reid, N. (2007). Applied Asymptotics: Case Studies in Small-Sample Statistics. Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics 23. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2342742
  
• Breslow, N.E. and Clayton, D.G. (1993). Approximate inference in generalised linear models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 88 9–25.
• Brown, E.N., Barbieri, R., Eden, U.T. and Frank, L.M. (2004). Likelihood methods for neural spike train data analysis. In Computational Neuroscience. Chapman & Hall/CRC Math. Biol. Med. Ser. 253–286. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2029664
  
• Chen, J. and Sitter, R.R. (1999). A pseudo empirical likelihood approach to the effective use of auxiliary information in complex surveys. Statist. Sinica 9 385–406.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1707846
  
• Cox, D.R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 34 187–220. With discussion by F. Downton, Richard Peto, D.J. Bartholomew, D.V. Lindley, P.W. Glassborow, D.E. Barton, Susannah Howard, B. Benjamin, John J. Gart, L.D. Meshalkin, A.R. Kagan, M. Zelen, R.E. Barlow, Jack Kalbfleisch, R.L. Prentice and Norman Breslow, and a reply by D.R. Cox.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR341758
  
• Cox, D.R. and Hinkley, D.V. (1974). Theoretical Statistics. London: Chapman & Hall.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR370837
  
• Cox, D.R. and Reid, N. (1987). Parameter orthogonality and approximate conditional inference. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 49 1–39. With a discussion.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR893334
  
• Datta, G.S. and Mukerjee, R. (2004). Probability Matching Priors: Higher Order Asymptotics. Lecture Notes in Statistics 178. New York: Springer.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2053794
  
• Davis, R.A., Klüppelberg, C. and Steinkohl, C. (2012). Statistical inference for max-stable processes in space and time. Preprint, available at arXiv:1204.5581v1, accessed on August 6, 2012.
  arXiv: 1204.5581v1
  
• Davis, R.A. and Yau, C.Y. (2011). Comments on pairwise likelihood in time series models. Statist. Sinica 21 255–277.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2796862
  
• Davison, A.C. (2003). Statistical Models. Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics 11. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1998913
  
• Davison, A.C., Padoan, S.A. and Ribatet, M. (2012). Statistical modelling of spatial extremes. Statist. Sci. 27 161–186.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2963980
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/11-STS376
  Project Euclid: euclid.ss/1340110864
  
• DiCiccio, T.J. and Martin, M.A. (1993). Simple modifications for signed roots of likelihood ratio statistics. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 55 305–316.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1210437
  
• Divino, F., Frigessi, A. and Green, P.J. (2000). Penalized pseudolikelihood inference in spatial interaction models with covariates. Scand. J. Statist. 27 445–458.
• Fan, J. and Li, R. (2001). Variable selection via nonconcave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 96 1348–1360.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1946581
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1198/016214501753382273
  
• Fearnhead, P. and Prangle, D. (2012). Constructing summary statistics for approximate Bayesian computation: Semi-automatic approximate Bayesian computation. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 74 419–474.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2925370
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.01010.x
  
• Fisher, R.A. (1922). On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 222, 309–368.
• Fisher, R.A. (1956). Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd. Third edition 1973.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR346955
  
• Fraser, D.A.S., Reid, N. and Wu, J. (1999). A simple general formula for tail probabilities for frequentist and Bayesian inference. Biometrika 86 249–264.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1705367
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1093/biomet/86.2.249
  
• Gao, X. and Massam, H. (2012). Composite likelihood estimation of high dimensional Gaussian graphical models with symmetry. Presented at BIRS Workshop on Composite Likelihood, April, 2012 (see Joe (2012)).
• Gao, X. and Song, P.X.K. (2010). Composite likelihood Bayesian information criteria for model selection in high-dimensional data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 105 1531–1540. Supplementary materials available online.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2796569
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1198/jasa.2010.tm09414
  
• Geyer, C.J. and Thompson, E.A. (1992). Constrained Monte Carlo maximum likelihood for dependent data. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 54 657–699. With discussion and a reply by the authors.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1185217
  
• Green, P.J. (1987). Penalized likelihood for general semi-parametric regression models. Internat. Statist. Rev. 55 245–259.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR963142
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/1403404
  
• Hjort, N.L., McKeague, I.W. and Van Keilegom, I. (2009). Extending the scope of empirical likelihood. Ann. Statist. 37 1079–1111.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2509068
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/07-AOS555
  Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1239369016
  
• Joe, H. (2012). Report on the Workshop on Composite Likelihood. Available at http://www.birs.ca/events/2012/5-day-workshops/12w5046.
• Lee, Y. and Nelder, J.A. (1996). Hierarchical generalized linear models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 58 619–678. With discussion.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1410182
  
• Lee, Y., Nelder, J.A. and Pawitan, Y. (2006). Generalized Linear Models with Random Effects: Unified Analysis via $H$-Likelihood. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 106. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2259540
  
• Liang, K.Y. and Zeger, S.L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73 13–22.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR836430
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1093/biomet/73.1.13
  
• Lindsay, B.G. (1988). Composite likelihood methods. In Statistical Inference from Stochastic Processes (Ithaca, NY, 1987). Contemp. Math. 80 221–239. Providence, RI: Amer. Math. Soc.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR999014
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1090/conm/080/999014
  
• Marin, J.M., Pudlo, P., Robert, C.P. and Ryder, R.J. (2011). Approximate Bayesian computational methods. Statist. Comput. 21 1–14.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2992292
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/s11222-011-9288-2
  
• Murphy, S.A. and van der Vaart, A.W. (2000). On profile likelihood. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 95 449–485. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1803168
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1080/01621459.2000.10474219
  
• Owen, A. (2001). Empirical Likelihood. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
• Pace, L. and Salvan, A. (1997). Principles of Statistical Inference From a Neo-Fisherian Perspective. Advanced Series on Statistical Science & Applied Probability 4. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1476674
  
• Pace, L. and Salvan, A. (2006). Adjustments of the profile likelihood from a new perspective. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 136 3554–3564.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2256276
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2004.11.016
  
• Renard, D., Molenberghs, G. and Geys, H. (2004). A pairwise likelihood approach to estimation in multilevel probit models. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 44 649–667.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2026438
  
• Rue, H., Martino, S. and Chopin, N. (2009). Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 71 319–392.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2649602
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00700.x
  
• Severini, T.A. (2000). Likelihood Methods in Statistics. Oxford Statistical Science Series 22. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1854870
  
• Sisson, S.A., Fan, Y. and Tanaka, M.M. (2007). Sequential Monte Carlo without likelihoods. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 1760–1765 (electronic).
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2301870
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1073/pnas.0607208104
  
• Tierney, L. and Kadane, J.B. (1986). Accurate approximations for posterior moments and marginal densities. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 81 82–86.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR830567
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1080/01621459.1986.10478240
  
• van der Vaart, A.W. (1998). Asymptotic Statistics. Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics 3. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1652247
  
• Varin, C., Reid, N. and Firth, D. (2011). An overview of composite likelihood methods. Statist. Sinica 21 5–42.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2796852
  
• Wedderburn, R.W.M. (1974). Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models, and the Gauss-Newton method. Biometrika 61 439–447.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR375592
  
• Wu, C. and Rao, J.N.K. (2006). Pseudo-empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for complex surveys. Canad. J. Statist. 34 359–375.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2328549
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1002/cjs.5550340301
  
• Xue, L., Zou, H. and Cai, T. (2012). Non-concave penalized composite conditional likelihood estimation of sparse Ising models. Ann. Statist. 40 1403–1429.
  Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR3015030
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/12-AOS1017
  Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1344610588