## The Annals of Probability

### Riffle shuffles of decks with repeated cards

#### Abstract

By a well-known result of Bayer and Diaconis, the maximum entropy model of the common riffle shuffle implies that the number of riffle shuffles necessary to mix a standard deck of 52 cards is either 7 or 11—with the former number applying when the metric used to define mixing is the total variation distance and the latter when it is the separation distance. This and other related results assume all 52 cards in the deck to be distinct and require all 52! permutations of the deck to be almost equally likely for the deck to be considered well mixed. In many instances, not all cards in the deck are distinct and only the sets of cards dealt out to players, and not the order in which they are dealt out to each player, needs to be random. We derive transition probabilities under riffle shuffles between decks with repeated cards to cover some instances of the type just described. We focus on decks with cards all of which are labeled either 1 or 2 and describe the consequences of having a symmetric starting deck of the form 1,…,1,2,…,2 or 1,2,…,1,2. Finally, we consider mixing times for common card games.

#### Article information

Source
Ann. Probab., Volume 34, Number 2 (2006), 804-819.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 9 May 2006

https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aop/1147179990

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1214/009117905000000675

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR2223959

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
1099.60007

Keywords
Descents multisets riffle shuffles

#### Citation

Conger, Mark; Viswanath, D. Riffle shuffles of decks with repeated cards. Ann. Probab. 34 (2006), no. 2, 804--819. doi:10.1214/009117905000000675. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aop/1147179990

#### References

• Aldous, D. and Diaconis, P. (1986). Shuffling cards and stopping times. Amer. Math. Monthly 93 333--348.
• Bayer, D. and Diaconis, P. (1992). Trailing the dovetail shuffle to its lair. Ann. Appl. Probab. 2 294--313.
• Diaconis, P. (1988). Group Representations in Probability and Statistics. IMS, Hayward, CA.
• Diaconis, P., McGrath, M. and Pitman, J. (1995). Riffle shuffles, cycles and descents. Combinatorica 15 11--29.
• Epstein, E. (1977). The Theory of Gambling and Statistical Logic, rev. ed. Academic Press, New York.
• Foata, D. and Schützenberger, M.-P. (1970). Théorie Géométrique des Polynômes Eulériens. Springer, Berlin.
• Fulman, J. (1998). The combinatorics of biased riffle shuffles. Combinatorica 18 173--184.
• Fulman, J. (2002). Applications of symmetric functions to cycle and increasing subsequence structure after shuffles. J. Algebraic Combin. 16 165--194.
• Graham, R. L., Knuth, D. E. and Patashnik, O. (1994). Concrete Mathematics, 2nd ed. Addison--Wesley, Reading, MA.
• Knuth, D. E. (1998). The Art of Computer Programming 3, 3rd ed. Addison--Wesley, Reading, MA.
• Lalley, S. P. (1996). Cycle structure of riffle shuffles. Ann. Probab. 24 49--73.
• MacMahon, P. A. (1915). Combinatory Analysis 1. Cambridge Univ. Press.
• Reyes, J.-C. U. (2002). Random walks, semidirect products, and card shuffling. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford Univ.
• Trefethen, L. N. and Trefethen, L. M. (2000). How many shuffles to randomize a deck of cards? Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 456 2561--2568.