Open Access
June 2016 Pseudo-value approach for conditional quantile residual lifetime analysis for clustered survival and competing risks data with applications to bone marrow transplant data
Kwang Woo Ahn, Brent R. Logan
Ann. Appl. Stat. 10(2): 618-637 (June 2016). DOI: 10.1214/16-AOAS927

Abstract

Quantile residual lifetime analysis is conducted to compare remaining lifetimes among groups for survival data. Evaluating residual lifetimes among groups after adjustment for covariates is often of interest. The current literature is limited to comparing two groups for independent data. We propose a pseudo-value approach to compare quantile residual lifetimes given covariates between multiple groups for independent and clustered survival data. The proposed method considers clustered event times and clustered censoring times in addition to independent event times and censoring times. We show that the method can also be used to compare multiple groups on the cause-specific residual life distribution in the competing risk setting, for which there are no current methods which account for clustering. The empirical Type I errors and statistical power of the proposed study are examined in a simulation study, which shows that the proposed method controls Type I errors very well and has higher power than an existing method. The proposed method is illustrated by a bone marrow transplant data set.

Citation

Download Citation

Kwang Woo Ahn. Brent R. Logan. "Pseudo-value approach for conditional quantile residual lifetime analysis for clustered survival and competing risks data with applications to bone marrow transplant data." Ann. Appl. Stat. 10 (2) 618 - 637, June 2016. https://doi.org/10.1214/16-AOAS927

Information

Received: 1 July 2015; Revised: 1 March 2016; Published: June 2016
First available in Project Euclid: 22 July 2016

zbMATH: 06625663
MathSciNet: MR3528354
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/16-AOAS927

Keywords: clustered data , Pseudo-value , Residual lifetime

Rights: Copyright © 2016 Institute of Mathematical Statistics

Vol.10 • No. 2 • June 2016
Back to Top