Open Access
June 2016 What we look at in paintings: A comparison between experienced and inexperienced art viewers
Anna-Kaisa Ylitalo, Aila Särkkä, Peter Guttorp
Ann. Appl. Stat. 10(2): 549-574 (June 2016). DOI: 10.1214/16-AOAS921

Abstract

How do people look at art? Are there any differences between how experienced and inexperienced art viewers look at a painting? We approach these questions by analyzing and modeling eye movement data from a cognitive art research experiment, where the eye movements of twenty test subjects, ten experienced and ten inexperienced art viewers, were recorded while they were looking at paintings.

Eye movements consist of stops of the gaze as well as jumps between the stops. Hence, the observed gaze stop locations can be thought of as a spatial point pattern, which can be modeled by a spatio-temporal point process. We introduce some statistical tools to analyze the spatio-temporal eye movement data, and compare the eye movements of experienced and inexperienced art viewers. In addition, we develop a stochastic model, which is rather simple but fits quite well to the eye movement data, to further investigate the differences between the two groups through functional summary statistics.

Citation

Download Citation

Anna-Kaisa Ylitalo. Aila Särkkä. Peter Guttorp. "What we look at in paintings: A comparison between experienced and inexperienced art viewers." Ann. Appl. Stat. 10 (2) 549 - 574, June 2016. https://doi.org/10.1214/16-AOAS921

Information

Received: 1 October 2014; Revised: 1 December 2015; Published: June 2016
First available in Project Euclid: 22 July 2016

zbMATH: 06625660
MathSciNet: MR3528351
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/16-AOAS921

Keywords: coverage , intensity , point process , shift function , Transition probability

Rights: Copyright © 2016 Institute of Mathematical Statistics

Vol.10 • No. 2 • June 2016
Back to Top