The Annals of Applied Statistics

Pairwise comparison of treatment levels in functional analysis of variance with application to erythrocyte hemolysis

Olga Vsevolozhskaya, Mark Greenwood, and Dmitri Holodov

Full-text: Open access

Abstract

Motivated by a practical need for the comparison of hemolysis curves at various treatment levels, we propose a novel method for pairwise comparison of mean functional responses. The hemolysis curves—the percent hemolysis as a function of time—of mice erythrocytes (red blood cells) by hydrochloric acid have been measured among different treatment levels. This data set fits well within the functional data analysis paradigm, in which a time series is considered as a realization of the underlying stochastic process or a smooth curve. Previous research has only provided methods for identifying some differences in mean curves at different times. We propose a two-level follow-up testing framework to allow comparisons of pairs of treatments within regions of time where some difference among curves is identified. The closure multiplicity adjustment method is used to control the family-wise error rate of the proposed procedure.

Article information

Source
Ann. Appl. Stat., Volume 8, Number 2 (2014), 905-925.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 1 July 2014

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoas/1404229519

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1214/14-AOAS723

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR3262539

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
06333781

Keywords
Functional data analysis FANOVA multiple comparison permutation method pairwise comparison

Citation

Vsevolozhskaya, Olga; Greenwood, Mark; Holodov, Dmitri. Pairwise comparison of treatment levels in functional analysis of variance with application to erythrocyte hemolysis. Ann. Appl. Stat. 8 (2014), no. 2, 905--925. doi:10.1214/14-AOAS723. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoas/1404229519


Export citation

References

  • Basso, D., Pesarin, F., Solmaso, L. and Solari, A. (2009). Permutation Tests for Stochastic Ordering and ANOVA: Theory and Applications with R. Springer, Dordrecht.
  • Berk, M., Ebbels, T. and Montana, G. (2011). A statistical framework for biomarker discovery in metabolomic time course data. Bioinformatics 27 1979–1985.
  • Cox, D. D. and Lee, J. S. (2008). Pointwise testing with functional data using the Westfall–Young randomization method. Biometrika 95 621–634.
  • Cuesta-Albertos, J. A. and Febrero-Bande, M. (2010). A simple multiway ANOVA for functional data. TEST 19 537–557.
  • Cuevas, A., Febrero, M. and Fraiman, R. (2004). An anova test for functional data. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 47 111–122.
  • Delicado, P. (2007). Functional $k$-sample problem when data are density functions. Comput. Statist. 22 391–410.
  • García Rodríguez, L. A., Hernández-Díaz, S. and de Abajo, F. J. (2001). Association between aspirin and upper gastrointestinal complications: Systematic review of epidemiologic studies. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 52 563–571.
  • Gower, J. C. and Krzanowski, W. J. (1999). Analysis of distance for structured multivariate data and extensions to multivariate analysis of variance. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C. Appl. Stat. 48 505–519.
  • Griswold, C. K., Gomulkiewicz, R. and Heckman, N. (2008). Hypothesis testing in comparative and experimental studies of function-valued traits. Evolution 62 1229–1242.
  • Hochberg, Y. and Tamhane, A. C. (1987). Multiple Comparison Procedures. Wiley, New York.
  • Holodov, D. B. and Nikolaevski, V. A. (2012). A method for preventing damages to the stomach mucous membrane when taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Patent RU 2449784. Available at http://www.findpatent.ru/patent/244/2449784.html.
  • Horváth, L. and Kokoszka, P. (2012). Inference for Functional Data with Applications. Springer, New York.
  • Marcus, R., Peritz, E. and Gabriel, K. R. (1976). On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance. Biometrika 63 655–660.
  • Masri, R. and Redner, R. A. (2005). Convergence rates for uniform $B$-spline density estimators on bounded and semi-infinite domains. J. Nonparametr. Stat. 17 555–582.
  • Nasonov, E. L. and Karateev, A. E. (2006). The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Clinical recommendations. Russian Medical Journal 14 1769–1777.
  • Pesarin, F. (1992). A resampling procedure for nonparametric combination of several dependent tests. Stat. Methods Appl. 1 87–101.
  • Petrondas, D. A. and Gabriel, K. R. (1983). Multiple comparisons by rerandomization tests. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 78 949–957.
  • Pollard, K. S., Gilbert, H. N., Ge, Y., Taylor, S. and Dudoit, S. (2011). multtest: Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing. R package version 2.10.0.
  • R Development Core Team (2012). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available at http://www.R-project.org/.
  • Ramsay, J. O., Hooker, G. and Graves, S. (2009). Functional Data Analysis with R and MATLAB. Springer, Dordrecht.
  • Ramsay, J. O. and Silverman, B. W. (2005). Functional Data Analysis, 2nd ed. Springer, New York.
  • Rice, J. A. and Wu, C. O. (2001). Nonparametric mixed effects models for unequally sampled noisy curves. Biometrics 57 253–259.
  • Shen, Q. and Faraway, J. (2004). An $F$ test for linear models with functional responses. Statist. Sinica 14 1239–1257.
  • Storey, J. D., Xiao, W., Leek, J. T., Tompkins, R. G. and Davis, R. D. (2005). Significance analysis of time course microarray experiments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120 12837–12842.
  • Troendle, J. F. and Westfall, P. H. (2011). Permutational multiple testing adjustments with multivariate multiple group data. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 141 2021–2029.
  • Vsevolozhskaya, O. A., Greenwood, M. C. and Holodov, D. (2014). Supplement to “Pairwise comparison of treatment levels in functional analysis of variance with application to erythrocyte hemolysis.” DOI:10.1214/14-AOAS723SUPP.
  • Vsevolozhskaya, O. A., Greenwood, M. C., Bellante, G. J., Powell, S. L., Lawrence, R. L. and Repasky, K. S. (2013). Combining functions and the closure principle for performing follow-up tests in functional analysis of variance. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 67 175–184.
  • Westfall, P. H. and Young, S. S. (1993). Resampling-Based Multiple Testing: Examples and Methods for P-Values Adjustment. Wiley, New York.
  • Wood, S. N. (2006). Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with $R$. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
  • Zaykin, D. V., Zhivotovsky, L. A., Westfall, P. H. and Weir, B. S. (2002). Truncated product method for combining $p$-values. Genet. Epidemiol. 22 170–185.

Supplemental materials

  • Supplementary material: Additional simulation results. Additional simulation results for the two models (M1 or M2), two different number of intervals ($m=5$ or $m=10$), and either 5 or 20 subjects per group are summarized in the tables below. Overall, these results indicate that the procedure tends to lose power as the number of intervals increases but gains power as the number of subjects per group increases.