Open Access
August 2008 Computable exponential bounds for screened estimation and simulation
Ioannis Kontoyiannis, Sean P. Meyn
Ann. Appl. Probab. 18(4): 1491-1518 (August 2008). DOI: 10.1214/00-AAP492

Abstract

Suppose the expectation E(F(X)) is to be estimated by the empirical averages of the values of F on independent and identically distributed samples {Xi}. A sampling rule called the “screened” estimator is introduced, and its performance is studied. When the mean E(U(X)) of a different function U is known, the estimates are “screened,” in that we only consider those which correspond to times when the empirical average of the {U(Xi)} is sufficiently close to its known mean. As long as U dominates F appropriately, the screened estimates admit exponential error bounds, even when F(X) is heavy-tailed. The main results are several nonasymptotic, explicit exponential bounds for the screened estimates. A geometric interpretation, in the spirit of Sanov’s theorem, is given for the fact that the screened estimates always admit exponential error bounds, even if the standard estimates do not. And when they do, the screened estimates’ error probability has a significantly better exponent. This implies that screening can be interpreted as a variance reduction technique. Our main mathematical tools come from large deviations techniques. The results are illustrated by a detailed simulation example.

Citation

Download Citation

Ioannis Kontoyiannis. Sean P. Meyn. "Computable exponential bounds for screened estimation and simulation." Ann. Appl. Probab. 18 (4) 1491 - 1518, August 2008. https://doi.org/10.1214/00-AAP492

Information

Published: August 2008
First available in Project Euclid: 21 July 2008

zbMATH: 1255.60016
MathSciNet: MR2434178
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/00-AAP492

Subjects:
Primary: 60C05 , 60F10
Secondary: 60E15 , 60G05

Keywords: computable bounds , estimation , large deviations , measure concentration , Monte Carlo , simulation , variance reduction

Rights: Copyright © 2008 Institute of Mathematical Statistics

Vol.18 • No. 4 • August 2008
Back to Top