## The Annals of Applied Probability

### Biased random-to-top shuffling

Johan Jonasson

#### Abstract

Recently Wilson [Ann. Appl. Probab. 14 (2004) 274–325] introduced an important new technique for lower bounding the mixing time of a Markov chain. In this paper we extend Wilson’s technique to find lower bounds of the correct order for card shuffling Markov chains where at each time step a random card is picked and put at the top of the deck. Two classes of such shuffles are addressed, one where the probability that a given card is picked at a given time step depends on its identity, the so-called move-to-front scheme, and one where it depends on its position.

For the move-to-front scheme, a test function that is a combination of several different eigenvectors of the transition matrix is used. A general method for finding and using such a test function, under a natural negative dependence condition, is introduced. It is shown that the correct order of the mixing time is given by the biased coupon collector’s problem corresponding to the move-to-front scheme at hand.

For the second class, a version of Wilson’s technique for complex-valued eigenvalues/eigenvectors is used. Such variants were presented in [Random Walks and Geometry (2004) 515–532] and [Electron. Comm. Probab. 8 (2003) 77–85]. Here we present another such variant which seems to be the most natural one for this particular class of problems. To find the eigenvalues for the general case of the second class of problems is difficult, so we restrict attention to two special cases. In the first case the card that is moved to the top is picked uniformly at random from the bottom k=k(n)=o(n) cards, and we find the lower bound (n3/(4π2k(k−1)))logn. Via a coupling, an upper bound exceeding this by only a factor 4 is found. This generalizes Wilson’s [Electron. Comm. Probab. 8 (2003) 77–85] result on the Rudvalis shuffle and Goel’s [Ann. Appl. Probab. 16 (2006) 30–55] result on top-to-bottom shuffles. In the second case the card moved to the top is, with probability 1/2, the bottom card and with probability 1/2, the card at position nk. Here the lower bound is again of order (n3/k2)logn, but in this case this does not seem to be tight unless k=O(1). What the correct order of mixing is in this case is an open question. We show that when k=n/2, it is at least Θ(n2).

#### Article information

Source
Ann. Appl. Probab., Volume 16, Number 2 (2006), 1034-1058.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 29 June 2006

https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoap/1151592258

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1214/10505160600000097

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR2244440

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
1126.60009

#### Citation

Jonasson, Johan. Biased random-to-top shuffling. Ann. Appl. Probab. 16 (2006), no. 2, 1034--1058. doi:10.1214/10505160600000097. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoap/1151592258

#### References

• Aldous, D. and Diaconis, P. (1986). Shuffling cards and stopping times. Amer. Math. Monthly 93 333–348.
• Bayer, D. and Diaconis, P. (1992). Trailing the dovetail shuffle to its lair. Ann. Appl. Probab. 2 294–313.
• Durrett, R. (1991). Probability: Theory and Examples. Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA.
• Goel, S. (2006). Analysis of top to bottom-$k$ shuffles. Ann. Appl. Probab. 16 30–55.
• Hildebrand, M. (1990). Rates of convergence of some random processes on finite groups. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard Univ.
• Jonasson, J. (2006). The overhand shuffle mixes in $\Theta(n^2\log n)$ steps. Ann. Appl. Probab. 16 231–243.
• Lindvall, T. (1992). Lectures on the Coupling Method. Wiley, New York.
• Mossel, E., Peres, Y. and Sinclair, A. (2004). Shuffling by semi-random transpositions. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science 572–581. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA.
• Rodrigues, E. (1995). Convergence to stationarity for a Markov move-to-front scheme. J. Appl. Probab. 32 768–776.
• Saloff-Coste, L. (2004). Total variation lower bounds for Markov chains: Wilson's lemma. In Random Walks and Geometry (V. A. Kaimanovich, K. Schmidt and W. Goess, eds.) 515–532. de Gruyter, Berlin.
• Wilson, D. B. (2003). Mixing time of the Rudvalis shuffle. Electron. Comm. Probab. 8 77–85.
• Wilson, D. B. (2004). Mixing times of lozenge tiling and card shuffling Markov chains. Ann. Appl. Probab. 14 274–325.