Advances in Applied Probability
- Adv. in Appl. Probab.
- Volume 48, Number 2 (2016), 332-348.
On the equivalence of systems of different sizes, with applications to system comparisons
Bo H. Lindqvist, Francisco J. Samaniego, and Arne B. Huseby
Abstract
The signature of a coherent system is a useful tool in the study and comparison of lifetimes of engineered systems. In order to compare two systems of different sizes with respect to their signatures, the smaller system needs to be represented by an equivalent system of the same size as the larger system. In the paper we show how to construct equivalent systems by adding irrelevant components to the smaller system. This leads to simpler proofs of some current key results, and throws new light on the interpretation of mixed systems. We also present a sufficient condition for equivalence of systems of different sizes when restricting to coherent systems. In cases where for a given system there is no equivalent system of smaller size, we characterize the class of lower-sized systems with a signature vector which stochastically dominates the signature of the larger system. This setup is applied to an optimization problem in reliability economics.
Article information
Source
Adv. in Appl. Probab., Volume 48, Number 2 (2016), 332-348.
Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 9 June 2016
Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aap/1465490751
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR3511764
Zentralblatt MATH identifier
1344.60084
Subjects
Primary: 60K10: Applications (reliability, demand theory, etc.)
Secondary: 62N05: Reliability and life testing [See also 90B25] 90B50: Management decision making, including multiple objectives [See also 90C29, 90C31, 91A35, 91B06]
Keywords
Coherent system system signature $k$-out-of-$n$ system mixed system reliability polynomial irrelevant component cut set critical path vector stochastic order reliability economics
Citation
Lindqvist, Bo H.; Samaniego, Francisco J.; Huseby, Arne B. On the equivalence of systems of different sizes, with applications to system comparisons. Adv. in Appl. Probab. 48 (2016), no. 2, 332--348. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aap/1465490751