Open Access
May 2008 Randomization Does Not Justify Logistic Regression
David A. Freedman
Statist. Sci. 23(2): 237-249 (May 2008). DOI: 10.1214/08-STS262

Abstract

The logit model is often used to analyze experimental data. However, randomization does not justify the model, so the usual estimators can be inconsistent. A consistent estimator is proposed. Neyman’s non-parametric setup is used as a benchmark. In this setup, each subject has two potential responses, one if treated and the other if untreated; only one of the two responses can be observed. Beside the mathematics, there are simulation results, a brief review of the literature, and some recommendations for practice.

Citation

Download Citation

David A. Freedman. "Randomization Does Not Justify Logistic Regression." Statist. Sci. 23 (2) 237 - 249, May 2008. https://doi.org/10.1214/08-STS262

Information

Published: May 2008
First available in Project Euclid: 21 August 2008

zbMATH: 1327.62018
MathSciNet: MR2516822
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/08-STS262

Keywords: average predicted probability , logistic regression , logit , models , Randomization

Rights: Copyright © 2008 Institute of Mathematical Statistics

Vol.23 • No. 2 • May 2008
Back to Top